Posts tagged Logic
SRR 114 Heaven’s Diaspora: John Piper & the Decline of Sola Fide at Final Judgment (5)
SRR 86 The Covenant of Works & New Covenant Theology, Part II

Carlos and Tim build a positive case for the Covenant of Works, discuss the relationship between Biblical and Systematic Theology, and throw down the gauntlet to New Covenant Theology proponents by proving it with a simple Bible phrase.

References (Recommended ones noted with a '+')

 +The Distinctiveness of Baptist Covenant Theology: A Comparison Between Seventeenth-Century Particular Baptist and Paedobaptist Federalism [Revised Edition] by Pascal Denault, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/23827777

+Hodge's Commentary on Romans 5, http://www.reformed.org/books/romans/rom_5b_hodge.html

+Richard Barcellos, https://press.founders.org/shop/getting-the-garden-right/

+Grace Family Baptist Church's Sermon Series, "Covenant, Law, and Sabbath," https://www.sermonaudio.com/search.asp?sourceonly=true&currSection=sermonssource&keyword=gracefamilybaptist&subsetcat=series&subsetitem=Covenant%2C+Law%2C+and+Sabbath

+http://confessingbaptist.com/1689Federalism/2015/06/12/kingdom-through-covenant-review-sam-renihan/

+https://thorncrownministries.com/blog/2017/03/22/semper-reformanda-radio-new-covenant-theology-playlist-resources

-The Letter To The Romans by William Barclay, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6508761

-http://wv4g.org/2013/12/14/new-covenant-theology-interview-blake-white/

-Gentry & Wellum, https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/gentry-and-wellum-respond-to-kingdom-through-covenant-reviews

+Walter J. Chantry, https://www.chapellibrary.org/book/cove/covenants,-the--(works-&-grace

+Francis Turretin, Institutes of Elenctic Theology, ed. James T. Dennison Jr., trans. George Musgrave Giger, vol. 1 (Phillipsburg: P&R Publishing, 1992–97), 575–76 (8.3.6–8), http://heidelblog.net/2016/03/turretin-defended-covenant-works/

+https://accordingtochrist.com/

+"One consequence of this denial of the covenant of works is that if Adam was not a party to the covenant of works, as these men assert, then neither was Christ, the Second and Last Adam. Therefore, Christ could not, did not, and was not supposed to pay the debts of, and earn salvation for, his people. As the Second and Last Adam, Christ did not by his active and passive obedience fulfill the Law of God, pay the debts of his people, and merit their salvation. Thus the denial of the covenant of works is an attack on the justice of God: on the imputation of Adam’s sin to his children, on the active obedience and work of Christ, on the imputation of Christ’s active obedience and righteousness to believers. By denying that Adam and Christ, as federal heads of their respective races, were subject to the covenant of works before the court of God’s justice, not his grace, each Adam being required to fulfill the terms of the covenant, one failing miserably, and the other succeeding perfectly, the Neolegalists put all believers on probation, and make their salvation depend on their own evangelical obedience." (John Robbins, http://trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=113)

SRR 20 Can You Prove the Existence of God?

Join Tim and Carlos as they discuss the differences between Clarkian Scripturalism and Van Tilian Presuppositionalism, as well as the age-old question, "Can you prove God exists?” Some listeners may notice that this episode was recorded several months prior to its release, however, we believe the information is still relevant and beneficial. This will be part one of a three-part series.

Questions? Comments? Feedback? Find us at:

https://thorncrownministries.com/

SRR #6 | The Sabbath, Logic, and NCT's Straw Man Army | From Russia, With Love

Tim and Carlos are excited to introduce Owen Paun, a missionary to Bulgaria, to the podcast! In this episode, they discuss Russia's draconian, anti-evangelism laws; the Sabbath; quotes by New Covenant Theology (NCT) authors John Reisinger and David Gay; logic; NCT's army of fallacies; confessions; the tripartite distinction of the Mosaic law; and more. I apologize if I offended anyone when describing the Pharisees as retarded in a previous episode. I was not referring to the mentally handicapped, but to those who willfully deceive themselves and others. –Carlos

Questions? Comments? Feedback? Email us at semper.reformanda.radio@gmail.com!

References: •http://www.christusvictornetwork.com/ask-a-millennial-christian/rules-of-rhetoric-or-how-to-win-an-argument-without-even-trying/ •Voddie Baucham, “The Sabbath Before the Command,” http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=410151353280 •Gordon H. Clark, "God and Logic," http://trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=16 •Michael D. Marlowe, "The Westminster Confession of Faith: According to the Text of the First Edition, and with the Original Scripture Proofs. With Notes Showing the Changes Introduced by Church Synods up to the Present Day," http://www.bible-researcher.com/wescon01.html •"American Revisions to the Westminster Confession of Faith," http://www.opc.org/documents/WCF_orig.html •Collection 10: Christian Theology, “What Do Presbyterians Believe?” by Gordon H. Clark, www.trinitylectures.org/MP3_downloads.php •David Gay, Redemption History Through Covenants, https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bw8DX7Vtr3vJckUza1VQYnFGcE0/view •John Reisinger, Abraham’s Four Seeds, http://worldwithoutend.info/bbc/books/NC/abrahams_seed/intro.htm •http://s667673408.onlinehome.us/#!Christianity-and-Logic/c16h1/57a26b2c0cf2fd413b4bf948 •Elihu Carranza, The Logic Classroom, http://logic-classroom.weebly.com/ •Jonathan F. Bayes, The Threefold Division of the Law, www.christian.org.uk/wp-content/dow…of-the-law.pdf •Augustine, Contra Faustum, VI.2, http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/140606.htm •Justin Martyr, "Chapter XLV: Those who were righteous before and under the law shall be saved by Christ," Dialogue with Trypho, http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.viii.iv.xlv.html •John Calvin, "Of Civil Government," Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book IV, Chapter 20, Section 14, http://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/institutes.vi.xxi.html •Thomas Aquinas, "Of the Precepts of the Old Law," Summa Theologica, 2a, Question 99, Article 4, http://www.ccel.org/a/aquinas/summa/FS/FS099.html